Magento code quality audit

We report what's in the code, not who wrote it. Most debt is the product of deadlines, staff changes and decisions that were reasonable at the time, and that context usually matters more than blame. If you want the audit to inform a conversation about capability, we'll give you the facts and stay out of the conversation.

Scoped on the first call against module count and how much of the codebase is custom, then quoted as a fixed price before work starts. Remediation is quoted separately and phased into normal releases.

Yes. A repository, composer files and pipeline configuration cover most of it. A few findings, runtime behaviour and configuration reconciliation, need more, and we'll record what we couldn't verify.

It gets specific attention. Unreviewed AI output tends to be plausible rather than correct: a Magento pattern misused, something the framework already provides re-implemented, an abstraction nobody needed. We build with agentic AI ourselves, under review, so we know what to look for.

Yes, and pair it with the security audit. Together they tell you what you're acquiring: the codebase's condition, the upgrade liability, the remediation cost for year one, and whether the platform is exposed or already compromised.